The Judge who stood against the Prime Minister
Post By Yash Kalra on 21-May-2015
A time when India is rocked with allegations of corruption in the judiciary, it might be hard to imagine a judge who can gather courage to stand up against the government. But here is the story of a judge who once did, even if it meant losing the post of the Chief Justice of India. He might be the single reason Democracy is still alive in our country.
A man so honourable that it cost him his job, so brave that he stood up against the Prime Minister when others didn’t dare to, a judge so fair that he did not think of the consequences when he stood for the right decision. The man of story is Hans Raj Khanna, legendary judge of the Supreme Court of India during 1967-77.
Born in Amritsar, Punjab on July 3, 1912, Khanna was the son of a freedom fighter Sarb Dyal Khanna who was a lawyer and later became the mayor of Amritsar. Following his father’s footsteps, Khanna decided to study law after school. Soon after receiving the degree he started his own practice which was a success.
He had given many life-notching verdicts in his life. But the one thing we admire him the most for, is his stand in the Habeas Corpus case (ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla) during Indira Gandhi’s emergency. When Indira Gandhi lost her election case on June 12, 1975, she was granted only conditional stay which meant that she could not exercise her voting or speaking powers in the Lok Sabha and became just a nominal prime minister. She immediately declared a state of internal emergency. This gave her the authority to rule by decree, which allowed her to suspend elections and civil liberties. This type of rule is often used by dictators.
He was the only judge in a five-member bench to go against the decision that if a person is ill-treated or his family members are detained without legal authority, he can’t approach the court for any justice and that there is no remedy to this situation. In his dissent, Khanna said, “What is at stake is the rule of law… the question is whether the law speaking through the authority of the Court shall be absolutely silenced and rendered mute…”. The court went by the majority and declared that a person has no remedy for illegal detentions, unauthorized demolitions, murder and mayhem. The Supreme Court sanctioned “the rule of lawlessness.”
Khanna sensed that after his stand, his judgeship might be in jeopardy. On the day he was to give his opinion for the fated case, he had mentioned to his sister, “I have prepared my judgment, which is going to cost me the Chief Justice-ship of India.” He was soon proved right.
In spite of enjoying the support and respect of all the bar associations and the entire legal community, he was superseded for the post of Chief Justice of India by Indira Gandhi in January 1977, and the same day he sent in his resignation. Rather, he took a decision he believed in, irrespective of his ambitions, even if it required him to go against everyone, even the prime minister.
He got international fame for his decision and was praised by many. George H Gadbois noted in his book “Judges of the Supreme Court of India” that later when Justice Khanna became the Chairman of the Eighth Law Commission, he served in this capacity without salary in order to work independently from the government. “If India ever finds its way back to the freedom of democracy that were proud hallmarks of its first 18 years as an independent nation, someone will surely erect a monument to Justice Khanna of the Supreme Court,” wrote the New York Times about him.